When “Fast & Furious” actor Paul Walker died in November, he left behind an estate with an estimated value of $25 million. The 40-year-old unmarried movie actor created an estate plan in 2001 — a will and trust shifting assets to his now-15-year-old daughter.

Young California adults are likely to have very different priorities, lifestyles and goals than people at age 40. Outdated estate planning documents don’t reflect changes in relationships, finances or feelings. Legal and family problems can occur unless a plan is revisited regularly and adjusted to mirror a current status.

Paul Walker was 28 when he drew up a will, at the same time the first movie of the “Fast & Furious” franchise was released. Walker’s wealth likely grew substantially as the years went by, but the will wasn’t amended. The actor designated his mother as the guardian of his daughter, but it’s uncertain whether the teen’s mother has or will retain current custody.

The minor daughter was the only beneficiary of Walker’s revocable trust. The actor gave his mother control over assets on the girl’s behalf. Since trusts are not public records, it’s unclear whether the teen will come into her full inheritance upon reaching adulthood or, as many trusts stipulate, receive staggered proceeds from the estate over a long period.

Legal observers noted that Walker’s trust was not fully funded. In other words, some assets owned by the actor were not transferred into the trust’s name and may be subject to estate taxes. Assets placed in trusts become the property of the trust and, consequently, are not taxed as part of an individual’s estate.

A pour-over will such as Walker had allows estate assets outside a trust at the time of a person’s death to be shifted to the trust. This type of will has the same effect on the estate as if the assets were already included in the trust.

Source: Forbes, “Five Estate Planning Lessons From The Paul Walker Estate” Danielle and Andy Mayoras, Feb. 10, 2014

Posted in Trust Administration | No Comments »

The estates of wealthy California residents can be subject to high federal taxes unless provisions are made to preserve assets. One goal of estate planning is to minimize the tax burden so that beneficiaries are not deprived unnecessarily of full inheritances.

Federal estate taxes kick in when an estate is valued at more than $5.25 million or $10.5 million for married couples. The potential federal estate tax rate is 45 percent, but this applies only when available estate planning tools are ignored.

Few Americans are required to pay any estate taxes at all. Those who do make up less far less than one percent of the population and, among them, the average estate tax rate is 17 percent.

Trusts are available to match financial wishes before and after death. A grantor-retained annuity trust is effective for gift and estate tax avoidance. An annuity is built in to the trust over a set term for the benefit of the trust creator, known as the donor. What’s left eventually passes to beneficiaries, minus the gift tax.

Trusts may involve charitable giving. A charitable remainder unit trust is similar to a GRAT. Upon the donor’s death, the leftover principal is transferred to one or more charities. A donor who sets up a charitable lead trust will see no direct income. Money is directed to a charity before death and to beneficiaries thereafter.

An irrevocable life insurance trust prevents taxation of life insurance proceeds. Insurance policies become the property of an ILIT trustee, who cannot be a donor but may be a beneficiary. Because you no longer own assets placed in trusts, the property cannot be taxed as part of an estate.

Strategies used to reduce estate taxes vary with the assets and goals of the strategist. Estate tax reduction requires financial and legal assistance, but expenses to protect wealth can be well worth the investment.

Source: Bloomberg, “Who pays a 45% rate on estate taxes?” Barry Ritholtz, Jan. 30, 2014

Posted in Trust Administration | No Comments »

Who will receive your retirement savings when you die? Will it be the heir named in your will or the forgotten beneficiary you chose years ago? If you believe a California will trumps a beneficiary designation, think again.

The most carefully designed and tended estate plan is flawed if beneficiaries are not updated. When you opened the retirement account you began decades ago or bought life insurance at the beginning of your first marriage, you chose people who would inherit the proceeds upon your death.

Unless life hasn’t changed one iota since you made the beneficiary designations, your estate could be split between outdated desires and present wishes. Long-held bank accounts, investments, insurance and retirement plans may contain the names of beneficiaries you no longer want to inherit your assets, like a former spouse.

Problems also occur when a primary beneficiary dies but no secondary beneficiary is named. A financial account could be in legal limbo when you die, if the only listed beneficiary dies before you.

Perhaps you named your first child as a life insurance beneficiary, but never updated the policy after you became a parent to more children. Upon your death, the child could receive a disproportionately large inheritance, simply because you never went back to adjust the policy’s beneficiary designation.

Skipping over a beneficiary choice can be damaging, too. Loved ones eventually may receive funds you left in an IRA minus a named beneficiary, but tax rules will punish the heirs. A chosen beneficiary has options to spread out taxes on inherited IRA withdrawals that undesignated heirs do not have.

Financial consultants suggest once-a-year beneficiary reviews or at least timing updates around life-altering events. Marriage, the birth of every child or grandchild, divorce, an account ownership switch, a retirement plan rollover, beneficiary disability and family deaths create changes that need to be reflected in a Los Angeles estate plan.

Posted in Estate Planning | No Comments »

The totality of what you own is your estate. Sometimes, Los Angeles residents feel assets don’t need estate planning attention until later in life. After all, when you’re a young California adult, a lot of what you earn is burned up in expenses like college tuition, buying a vehicle or getting married.

It can take time before a person begins to think seriously about wealth building, much less asset distribution. Almost everybody owns something of value, whether it’s a marketable asset like a home or a sentimental treasure. Estate planning makes you think about the people who will have your possessions, after you can no longer enjoy them.

Estate plans also serve other purposes. For instance, wills designate who receives your non-investment assets. If you’re a parent, a will can spell out who should care for your minor children. Without a will, a probate court will make these decisions, which may not align with what you had in mind.

Estate planning documents are designed to make asset transfers as stress-free as possible for heirs and beneficiaries. Again, you have to consider what would happen without taking the time to create proper legal documents. It’s likely your heirs would lose some of their rightful inheritance to court costs and legal fees, devoted to straightening out your open-ended estate.

You don’t have to be a senior citizen to suffer incapacity. Illnesses and accidents can deprive you of the ability to manage your own medical decisions or financial affairs. Estate planning documents like powers of attorney cover this territory for people of any age.

Estate planning offers something that lack of estate planning does not. You gain control over what happens to the things that you’ve worked an entire lifetime to own. Few people want a stranger in a courtroom to make choices for them, but that’s exactly what could happen without legal plans for your possessions.

Source: Noozhawk, “Craig Allen: It’s Never Too Early to Start the Financial Planning Process” Craig Allen, Jan. 19, 2014

Posted in Estate Planning | No Comments »

Aging California parents frequently choose a loved one, often an adult child, to handle personal finances when they no longer desire or feel competent to make wise money decisions. You might start out informally by using a parent’s PIN code to make an automatic teller transaction or step in to reconcile a bank statement.

Money management for a parent may seem like a natural part of caregiving, as much as taking over yard chores or grocery shopping. Laws don’t govern how you clip hedges, but they do kick in when you assume financial responsibility for another person. The job even has a title – fiduciary.

Financial arrangements between parents and children can remain informal, unless a parent is incapacitated. The assets and liabilities of a parent unable to make choices are not yours to manage without legal permission. An estate planning tool called a durable financial power of attorney eliminates the need for an adult child to get a court’s approval to handle a parent’s finances.

The document, initiated by the parent, designates a person or third party to take control while the parent is alive, but no longer capable of making financial decisions. Powers of attorney also exist that give fiduciaries the right to manage finances for a parent who can but no longer wants to cope with money management.

A fiduciary’s allegiance is to the person who made the choice to trust him. You are managing property and money on behalf of someone else, a duty that should not overlap with personal financial interests. Improper decisions, like commingling a parent’s money with your own, can be challenged in court.

Many people are thrust into a fiduciary position with little knowledge about the duties they are supposed to perform or the limits of the law. A parent can make the transition easier by including a proposed fiduciary in discussions with an estate planning attorney.

Source: BizTimes, “A guide to managing someone else’s finances” Jason Alderman, Jan. 14, 2014

Posted in Trustees Executors & Fiduciaries | No Comments »

The loss of a loved one is a highly-stressful event. Someone, often a close family member, also may be responsible for the settlement of the decedent’s estate. An attorney’s input is useful, since some legal issues require attention even as survivors struggle to manage their grief.

The first step is to learn what power you have to make decisions. Make no assumptions about settling a California estate until you find and see a will or trust naming you as a fiduciary – an executor or trustee. Without this power, any move you make to resolve the decedent’s financial matters is invalid and improper.

When an individual dies without a will, a probate judge chooses an estate administrator. The court-appointed representative, who may be a third party, performs the same duties that would have applied to an executor.

Multiple copies of death certificates, supplied by a funeral home, will be necessary throughout the estate settlement process – from tax to benefit filings. A will must be filed with the appropriate court, a task that may be undertaken by an executor, attorney or possibly the bank where the will was stored.

Other vital paperwork includes additional estate planning and personal identification documents, like birth and marriage certificates and a Social Security card. Assets and liabilities must be identified through insurances, account statements, deeds and titles. Bills must be tallied and paid. Beneficiaries whose names are found in the discovery process must be notified.

Contact should be established with the decedent’s employer or ex-employer to locate benefits and insurances. Agencies that supplied benefits, including Social Security, and creditors must be notified. An Internal Revenue Service application should be submitted for an estate tax identification number.

Numerous estate settlement responsibilities are attached to timelines. It’s not unusual for an executor or trustee to seek at least temporary help from tax or legal professionals during the settlement of an estate.

Source: Ahwatukee Foothills News, “Settling a loved one’s financial affairs” Kim DeVoss, Jan. 06, 2014

Posted in Estate Administration | No Comments »

The age of maturity isn’t the same for all individuals and can differ by years from the age of majority or legal adulthood. Los Angeles parents who plan to leave their children a substantial inheritance often worry how assets will be handled once the children get them.

Estate planning allows parents to have control over the way children receive inheritances. Without a plan in place, a lot of money can be placed in a young spendthrift’s hands and evaporate rapidly. Fortunately, wills and trusts can be created to keep heirs from wasting the wealth you worked so hard to build.

California parents are often concerned heirs will not use estate assets responsibly or will become dependent on an inheritance without pursuing a career. Estate planning documents can hold inheritances in reserve, until an adult child reaches a particular age like 25, 30 or even older. The entire inheritance can be released at a given age or the funds can be staggered.

A parent may allow a trustee to supply an heir with additional funds under certain circumstances. A health crisis, higher education, marriage, the birth of a child and divorce are big life events that might qualify.

At the same time, a provision may be written in to the document that withholds funds from an adult child. A trustee can be given the power to refuse payments if the heir displays reckless behaviors like drug addiction or unchecked spending. This flexible plan eliminates the need for parents to guess or assume a child’s age of maturity.

A third-party trustee may not have the ability to monitor an heir’s good and bad habits. A relative may be more suited to the role of a trustee for an immature heir.

Parental concerns over the fate of inheritances are not uncommon. An attorney can present options designed for estate plans that allow you to retain control over asset distribution.

Source: The Atlanta Journal-Consitution, “Wes Moss: Make Your Estate a Blessing, Not a Curse” Wes Moss, Dec. 30, 2013

Posted in Estate Planning | No Comments »

The reason most Los Angeles residents have an individual retirement account is to help supplement income in later life or, following an account owner’s death, to add to the financial support of a surviving spouse. However, some California residents see IRAs as assets meant to be passed through an estate to heirs.

A new financial product has appeared on the market that features benefits similar to a trust in an estate plan. A trusteed IRA gives the account owner control over the distribution of IRA funds over time to a beneficiary, apparently with some tax advantages.

The financial services companies that market trusteed IRAs promote the idea that the products are cheaper than trusts to create. While that may be true, trust administration adds to the cost of a trusteed IRA over other types of individual retirement accounts. The expense may not be worth the investment, unless the IRA is worth a substantial amount; a minimum of $2 million is recommended by product carrier U.S. Bank.

A trust is managed by a trustee, chosen by the grantor. The management of a trusteed IRA is handled by a financial services employee, who may not have the same leeway as a trustee to adjust withdrawals, according to beneficiary need.

A control mechanism in trusteed IRAs allows the long-term dispersal of a limited amount of funds. The withdrawal may be as low as the Internal Revenue Service’s yearly minimum requirement, while the remaining funds are free to increase in value. The beneficiary potentially can end up with an asset worth far more than a straightforward cash inheritance.

The IRS is very particular about the way trusts are set up and administered. It’s a good idea to discuss the positives and negatives of a trust or trusteed IRA with a tax professional and estate planning attorney before sinking time, effort and assets in either estate-related investment.

Source: Market Watch, “Trusteed IRAs can help heirs manage inheritance” Kelly Greene, Dec. 19, 2013

Posted in Trust Administration | No Comments »

A Los Angeles forensic accountant can be hired to place a fair market price on the estate assets you have, but only you and your loved ones know the worth of sentimental objects. Some of the worst squabbles in probate occur over property that has little or no value outside of a family.

An insurance survey conducted last year discovered what baby boomers, now inheriting their World War II-era parents’ wealth, and older Americans thought about inheritances. Even more than money, the majority of boomers and people ages 72 and older said that they wanted to give or receive the stories, histories and heirlooms of their family members.

Family treasures aren’t necessarily expensive, but they have enough personal value to cause heirs to do battle in court. Parents can help avoid an estate administration nightmare by making preparations for the distribution of assets unique to an estate.

Estate planning attorneys suggest creating a discussion in a family group and with individual heirs about these important possessions. Children and others who know in advance what to expect when you die may not be thrilled with your choices, but they will be less tempted to fight if they aren’t shocked after your death.

Wills address your “big-ticket” assets. A memorandum can be added that directs keepsakes to individuals. To avoid any confusion, be as specific as possible in the description of the items in the memorandum and include photos of the property, when possible.

To a parent, a 4-year-old’s crayoned holiday picture can be more emotion-stirring than a masterpiece. The one-of-a-kind art adds a thread to the fabric that is a family’s story. As precious as Mona Lisa is, her painting couldn’t do all that. That’s why it is important to talk to an estate planning attorney about options for distributing heirlooms valuable to your family, regardless of their monetary value.

Source: Market Watch, “Your heirs want this even more than your money” Andrea Coombes, Dec. 16, 2013

Posted in Estate Administration | No Comments »

Independence is a precious possession that seniors often guard carefully as long as they feel sound in body and mind. Even when age or illness interferes with that independence, older people can be hard-pressed to give up activities like driving or balancing a bank statement.

Many elderly people in Los Angeles live alone, whether by choice or unfortunate circumstances, making them vulnerable to financial abuse. As we age, we often need assistance from family members, neighbors or a paid caregiver. A close relationship doesn’t mean a healthy one; seniors’ finances can be devastated by someone they trust.

The National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse released a 2010 report, co-sponsored by an insurance company, about seniors’ financial losses at the hands of “trusted” individuals. Older participants said they lost $2.9 billion to strangers or someone they knew, including children who took advantage of them. The problem is not uncommon or new, according to elder law and care experts.

If you are the caregiver chosen to take over an elderly person’s finances, you are a fiduciary – a relationship of trust in which a person acts in the best interests of someone else. The trusted individual may be a guardian, a trustee or an agent with power of attorney with responsibilities to manage finances efficiently and honestly. A senior may hand over car keys, identity records, bills, account numbers and credit cards to a fiduciary. Unfortunately, some caregivers take advantage of the position.

People can watch for signs of exploitation in older family members, friends and acquaintances. Some indicators include unusual purchases or gifts, failure to meet regular expenses, missing funds, sudden beneficiary changes and large or frequent bank transactions.

Age can rob a person of good physical health and strong cognitive abilities. Younger, caring individuals can help make sure that nothing else is taken from the elderly. If you see financial abuse, report it.

Source: dallasnews.com, “Steps caregivers can take to prevent senior financial abuse” Gordon Studer, Nov. 29, 2013

Posted in Trustees Executors & Fiduciaries | No Comments »